Friday, June 12, 2015

Culture and Tradition Destroyed: Native Americans and Buffalo Soldiers

Continuing in the reconstruction era, but moving away from business leaders, my class started discussing the Buffalo Soldiers and Native Americans. In order to learn about these soldiers and people, we watched a variety of videos on ABC Clio while also taking notes on a class shared Google doc. After taking notes and watching the videos, we then started to create questions on the topic to include into our class made final. By doing this, we were able to use the information and further learn it by making the questions. This was basically the same process we completed for the Rockefeller and Carnegie case study, so I was already familiar with the process. This made  it easier this time around to plan out all the questions and create the essential question. The essential question that my class and I created for this unit asks, "In what ways did the U.S. Government discriminate against buffalo soldiers and native Americans accidentally? And in what ways did they purposely discriminate? 
 

A flow Chart Showing Key Events

Throughout the reconstruction period, sharecropping among black families and white landowners was a common system during the late 1800s. Sharecropping is defined as, "a system of agriculture in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on the land." From first glance, this system sounds like a fair practice. However, it proved be a very controlling system, simply because the white landowners had great control over the black families. By doing this, blacks felt like they were slaves again. Knowing this, instead of participating in share cropping, Buffalo soldiers became soldiers because they knew that being a sharecropper would be awful. Therefore, the army started "Colored troops" and Andrew Johnson created 6 total regiments. The Buffalo soldiers were provided with an adequate amount of supplies, food, and homes. However, they were also called first upon to fight the Indians, as well as later wars such as the Spanish-American war . Aside from fighting, the Buffalo soldier also laid out electrical lines cutting off new settlers moving west. For many years, the Buffalo soldiers had everything they needed. However, during the post-civil war, the Americans expanded westward and took the land of the Buffalo soldiers. Americans used total war strategies against the Native Americans. They attacked the buffalo, their food supply, clothing, attacked horses and livestock, and even their homes. After this, nothing was the same. In the 1840s, the a discovery of gold caused a mass American Immigration Westward. Additionally, the government believed that Native Americans should be assimilated into society, therefore, they started to split up the land of the Native Americans. Also, 90% of their land went to white settlers. Although the U.S believed that they were doing a favor for the Native Americans, it was actually the exact opposite. Even though the government that they were the "Friends of the Native Americans", but the Native Americans were forced to conform with the society around them. In return, they were forced to leave their culture behind and basically their whole lives. In fact, they were encouraged to leave behind their roots.The land that the Native Americans were now living on was not at all good for farming, which made life very difficult. Aside from the Native Americans, Buffalo soldiers were still forced to fight, even though they were outnumbered. Buffalo soldiers were served under the worst conditions, didn't get to ride horses, and were forced to walk up to 90 miles. They also chased down rebel Native Americans to bring them back to Justice.
 
Additionally, in 1887 the Dawes Act was written. Looking at this document, this is regarded as one of the most significant pieces of federal legislation towards the Native Americans. The Objectives of the law was to promote Native Assimilation to U.S. culture and tradition, rather than their own, and open native lands to non-native settlement. The Dawes act gave Native Americans land, but this land 
A poster representing the Dawes Act of 1887
was a lot less than what they had previously inhabited. The settlers genuinely thought that they were doing the Native Americans a favor, but in reality they were harming them. Native Americans were told that they had respect from the government, however, the white settlers took advantage of their power. It is explained that, "Taught by the government that they had rights entitled to respect, when those rights have been assailed by the rapacity of the white man, the arm which should had been raised to protect them has ever been ready to sustain the aggressor." This shows how the white settlers had little respect for the native people and totally disregarded the fact that Native Americans should be respected too. Overall, whether intentional or accidental, the culture and lives of the Native Americans was destroyed. Buffalo soldiers also faced harsh times as well.
 
In my opinion, although very unjust, I believe that the white settlers genuinely thought hat they were helping to Native Americans and Buffalo soldiers. A lot of the actions of the white settlers were thought to be a favor for the Native Americans and Buffalo soldiers. However, it was the exact opposite. Many Native Americans were forced off their own land; land that they had worked long hours on and built their lives on. Because of the white settlers, Native Americans were forced to leave their cultural traditions behind, and learn the American way of life. Food, supplies, and homes were also destroyed during this time, which must had been hard on the Native Americans. Also, the government forced the Buffalo soldiers to fight even though they were outnumbered. Although there may have been some intentional discrimination, I believe that the US honestly thought that they were friends of the Natives and that they were doing right. Unfortunately, they were wrong and in return caused a lot of distress to the Native Americans and Buffalo soldiers.
 
 
Citations:
 
 

Friday, June 5, 2015

Important Men of the Booming Steel Industry

With only a few weeks of school left , we completed a self-guided lesson, in which we decided as a whole class on how to take notes, watch informational videos, and prepare for the final exam. This year, our final exam is a little different. Instead of the teacher creating the exam, we get to decide the multiple choice questions and learn the information using the various tools we have practiced over the school year. We decided to take notes in a group Google doc and watch the videos together as well. In this unit, we did a case study on Carnegie and Rockefeller, businessmen during the 19th century. During this time, the steel industry prospered greatly. Carnegie and Rockefeller rose and became some of America’s richest men.  By watching a variety of videos on ABC Clio and then analyzing them, I was able to gain a better understanding on the two influential men and their lives as businessmen. At the end of the lesson, our teacher instructed us to create our own essential question. Using our jotted notes and information we learned from the videos, our essential question is "Were Carnegie and Rockefeller robber barons or captains of industry? Before answering this question, it's important to define a few key terms. According to a series of ABC Clio videos, Robber Barons can be seen as corrupt and unsportsmanlike. Also, they bribed government officials, bought out or destroyed rivals, created giant monopolies and trusts, and citizens had a love hate relationship with them. On the other hand, captains of industry are good business leaders, the complete opposite of a Robber Baron.

John D. Rockefeller
Born on July 8th, 1939, John D Rockefeller grew to be one of America’s most well-known contributors to the Oil Industry. Although the term “Robber Baron” is quite harsh, it is clear that Rockefeller does deserve to be known by that term. Rockefeller can be called a robber baron simply because he used his power to destroy other businesses.  Rockefeller wanted his company to have as much of the market as possible. Knowing this, he used his position and his company, Standard oil, to further himself in his career. Rockefeller was very hungry for wealth, as he once said, “ "Some day IĆ­ll be the richest man in the world." With this mindset, he chose not to just compete with other businesses, but to buy them out in the process. It is described that, “in February 1865, he bought out all his partners except Samuel Andrews a move he later referred to as having "determined my career." Additionally, Under Rockefeller's skilled leadership, the company  pioneered in vertical integration within the oil industry, acquiring or building its own pipelines, controlling local distributors, and using its own tank cars. Here, “controlling” is the key word, which is often what robber barons did. With Rockefeller’s drive as a businessman, his company prospered. However, like mentioned above, he only had wealth on his mind. Focused solely on wealth, by 1880 he was able to secure a “virtual monopoly over oil refining and transportation”. According to the online Merriam-Webster dictionary, a monopoly is defined as, “exclusive possession or control”, which is exactly what Rockefeller had over the oil industry. Also, Rockefeller was both loved and hated by his peers, which is included in the definition of a robber baron. Although he did participate in philanthropy, giving money towards education, medicine, and science, many people still believed that everything he did was motivated by greed. This brought mistrust between him and his peers and people criticized and even condemned him. So, all in all, he did give a portion of his makings to a variety of causes, but he was seen as a greedy and controlling man of the 19th century.


Carnegie's famous piece of writing
Aside from John D Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie was also one of America's richest men. Compared to Rockefeller, Carnegie was a very different man, as he was was on the first “captains of industry” in the steel industry. As a businessman, he contributed positively and greatly to the citizens and community around him, which ultimately defines a captain of industry. Often, Carnegie publishes articles in a variety of newspapers and journals, one being known as, “The Gospel of Wealth” in 1889. In this article, he states his beliefs on the fact that though people should gain wealth and live successful personal lives, they should also distribute a portion of that wealth to people in need and important causes. Following his own advice, Carnegie and his wife gave 350 million dollars to churches, thousands of public libraries, education, and the cause of peace. Giving back to others undoubtedly very important to Carnegie. However, not only did he give money to people outside of his work environment, but he also believed in treating his workers well.. It is said that, “He believed in rewarding talent and frequently promoted exceptional workers into the ranks of management. He made his senior executives partners, thus providing them with greater incentives to work hard and make the company profitable.” Carnegie was most definitely a people person and enjoyed providing for others and making them happy. Because of this, Carnegie should be classified as a captain of industry during the 19th century.
 
After reading about these two men, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, I learned a lot more about them as people and their businesses as well. From both of their lives, I realized that in order to be known as a successful business man it is important to give back to the community and share your wealth. This is especially shown with Carnegie and the fact that he cared very much for his employees and fellow peers. Additionally, I learned that not everyone was generous with their money, as many people believed that Rockefeller was ruthless and greedy with his business tactics. In the end, using the videos and various documents, it can be concluded that  Rockefeller   is classified as a Robber Baron and Carnegie as a captain of industry.
 
 
Citations:

McGuire, William, and Leslie Wheeler. "Andrew Carnegie." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2015. Web. 31 May 2015

McGuire, William, and Leslie Wheeler. "John D. Rockefeller." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2015. Web. 31 May 2015